International Criminal Court judges have found two leaders of a predominantly Christian rebel group in the Central African Republic guilty of multiple counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
A general view of the exterior of the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands, March 12, 2025.
THE HAGUE, Netherlands () — International Criminal Court judges convicted two leaders of a predominantly Christian rebel group in the Central African Republic of multiple counts of war crimes and crimes against humanity on Thursday, sentencing each to more than a decade in prison.
Former Central African Republic soccer federation president Patrice-Edouard Ngaïssona and Alfred Yekatom, a rebel leader known as “Rambo,” were found guilty of their involvement in atrocities including murder, torture and attacking civilians.
The court sentenced Ngaïssona to 12 years, and Yekatom to 15 years.
The charges stem from their roles as senior leaders in a militia known as the anti-Balaka, which engaged in bitter fighting with the mainly Muslim Seleka rebel group in 2013 and 2014.
The interreligious violence left thousands dead and displaced hundreds of thousands.
Mosques, shops and homes were looted and destroyed.
Anti-Balaka forces “attacked localities with Muslim civilians, killing and dislocating many of them,” Presiding Judge Bertram Schmitt said, reading out the verdict in The Hague.
Malick Karomschi, president of the Muslim Organization for Innovation in the Central African Republic, a nongovernmental organization that supports victims of sexual violence, said that he’s glad that justice has been served.
“We feared the worst — that they would be acquitted so the fact that they were found guilty is already a good thing.” Karomschi told The.
The pair maintained their innocence during the trial, which opened in 2021.
It was the first case at the global court to focus on the violence that erupted after the Seleka seized power in the Central African Republic in 2013.
The country has been mired in conflict since rebels forced then President Francois Bozize from office.
The importance of the report depends on confirmed records, named authorities and any follow-up statements that clarify the scale, timing and public impact of the development.
The next useful information will be the most direct record available: an official notice, a named statement, an updated dataset, a court filing, a regulator note or a corrected public advisory.
